SpineUniverse Case Study Library

Transthoracic Resection of Thoracic Disc Herniation With Navigation

History

A 70-year-old female, with diabetes mellitus, presented with 6 weeks of bilateral abdominal pain radiating to the umbilicus and progressive bilateral lower extremity weakness. She had significant difficulty standing and was unable to walk. Her bowel and bladder function was normal.

Examination

The patient was awake, alert and oriented. Bilateral lower extremity clonus was 1-2 beats.

physical examination results

Pre-Treatment Imaging

Sagittal and axial lumbar MRIs show a large central and left T10-T11 disc herniation with severe spinal cord compression (Figs. 1, 2).

sagittal lumbar MRI, T10-T11 disc hernation with severe spinal cord compressionFigure 1. Sagittal lumbar MRI shows a large central and left T10-T11 disc herniation with severe spinal cord compression.

axial lumbar MRI, large central and left HNP T10-T11, severe spinal cord compressionFigure 2. Axial lumbar MRI shows a large central and left disc herniation at T10-T11 with severe spinal cord compression.

Diagnosis

Severe spinal cord compression and myelopathy

Survey Results

Click the tabs below to view the results segmented by specialty.
You chose: Laminectomy and discectomy
What treatment do you suggest?
All Clinicians (3 Responses)
What treatment do you suggest?
Neurosurgery (1 Response)
What treatment do you suggest?
Orthopaedics (1 Response)
What treatment do you suggest?
Pain Management (0 Responses)
What treatment do you suggest?
Other (1 Response)

Selected Treatment

Pre-operative fiducial placement in the T11 pedicle for intraoperative localization (Fig. 3).

pre-operative fiducial placement, right T11 pedicleFigure 3. Pre-operative fiducial placement placement into the right T11 pedicle.

Left thoracotomy to approach the lateral T10-T11 disc.

  • Navigation to assist with guidance
  • Resection of rib head
  • Partial T11 pedicle resection
  • Partial wedge corpectomies (~1-2 cm) of the T10 and T11 vertebral bodies adjacent to the disc
  • Herniated disc and posterior vertebral body walls pulled into the corpectomy defect
  • Interbody cage fusion (morselized rib autograft) and fixation with lateral pedicle screw and rod construct at T10-T11

The spine surgeon and thoracic surgeon are pictured exposing the lateral disc space and rib head (Fig. 4).

spine surgeon, thoracic surgeon expose lateral disc space and rib headFigure 4. The spine surgeon and thoracic surgeon pictured exposing the lateral disc space and rib head.

Using navigation, the left T11 pedicle is identified and resected (Fig. 5).

navigation used to identify and resect left T11 pedicleFigure 5. Identification and resection of the left T11 pedicle using navigation.

Using navigation to check the depth of the wedge corpectomy and to determine cage length (Fig. 6).

checking depth of wedge corpectomy, determining cage length with navigationFigure 6. Checking the depth of the wedge corpectomy and determining cage length with navigation.

Intraoperative photos of the discectomy, corpectomy defect and fusion construct (Figs. 7, 8).

Intraoperative photograph of the discectomy and corpectomy defectFigure 7. Intraoperative photograph of the discectomy and corpectomy defect.

Intraoperative photograph of the fusion constructFigure 8. Intraoperative photograph of the fusion construct.

Intraoperative O-arm© images show the corpectomy defect adjacent to the disc space on post instrumentation (Fig. 9).

o-arm images, corpectomy defect adjacent to disc space post instrumentationFigure 9. Intraoperative O-arm images show the corpectomy defect adjacent to disc space on post instrumentation.

Post-operative x-rays of the fusion construct (Fig 10).

post-operative x-ray fusion constructFigure 10. Post-operative x-rays of the fusion construct.

 

Outcome at 12 Weeks Post-Op

At the patient's 12-week post-op appointment, she is walking with assisted devices.

  • Ambulates with a walker when out and uses a cane at home.
  • Bilateral lower extremity motor function is 5/5; lower extremity hyperflexion is 4+/5
  • Diminished proprioception bilaterally in the lower extremities
  • Incision is healed
  • Driving
  • Fully continent

Surgeons' Rationale: Decision Making

  • Given the large size of the disc and its central location, an anterior approach was felt to be necessary.
  • The decision for arthrodesis was related to the need to perform an aggressive discectomy and guard against the need to perform revision surgery, of a high complexity.
  • Pre-operative fiducial placement permitted rapid identification of the level of interest.
  • Navigation permitted rapid intraoperative guidance for pedicle resection, identification of the foramen, completeness of discectomy and decompression across the spinal canal, graft placement and instrumentation without the use of fluoroscopy.

Peer Case Discussion

Dr. Ammerman and his team are congratulated for the great care their patient received. There are several excellent points that they discuss in this case which I would like to highlight and commend them for noting.

First, on the physical examination, they noted long track signs and weakness, which localized the compression to the thoracic spinal cord. The MRI localizes the disc herniation at T10-T11, but what is very important is that this was counted from the sacrum since the lumbar spine was visualized. About 20% of patients will have an abnormal number of thoracic/lumbar vertebrae and therefore, when counting from the top on the MRI and from the bottom in the operating room will lead to a wrong level surgery. Therefore, if the patient had only a thoracic MRI—either a scout film, radiographs of the entire spine—localizing the level pre-operatively (which was also done in this case) should be done.

Second, all thoracic disc herniations are not the same, and the author noted the multiple approaches to decompress the spinal cord. I agree that with a large central disc herniation, the safest approach is an anterior resection (actually, not true anterior but anterolateral). This is because with this approach, there is no manipulation of the injured spinal cord.

Third, they performed an aggressive decompression of the bone such to access the disc herniation. I also like to access the spinal column above and below the lesion with a partial corpectomy to minimize manipulation of the spinal cord.

Overall, an excellent decompression and recovering patient.

Community Case Discussion (0 comments)

SpineUniverse invites spine professionals to share their thoughts on this case.


SHOW MAIN MENU
SHOW SUB MENU
Cancel
Delete

Get new patient cases delivered to your inbox

Sign up for our healthcare professional eNewsletter, SpineMonitor.
Sign Up!