patient>conditions>chronic pain>  

 Comprehensive Evaluation of Chronic Back Pain

Daniel J. Mazanec, MD, FACP, FACR, FAADEP
Dept. Chairman, Center for the Spine
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, OH, USA
Medical content is copyright 2000-2006 spineuniverse.com
Spinal Column, Spring 2005. Cleveland Clinic Spine Institute (CCSI).
Copyright @2005. Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
http://cms.clevelandclinic.org/spine/documents/Spinal%20Column%20Sp05.pdf

The natural history of acute low back pain is very favorable.With simple education, activity modification and over-the-counter analgesics, most people recover fully within two to four weeks. However, when symptoms persist without significant improvement, further evaluation is required. A careful medical assessment is crucial to identify previously unrecognized conditions, inappropriate initial treatment and unrecognized complicating psychosocial issues.

Since most people with back pain improve within a few weeks, exhaustive evaluation is not appropriate and not usually performed at the initial evaluation. When symptoms persist, a careful history and physical examination focused on identifying rare but serious medical causes, such as malignancy or infection, should be performed. In many cases, historical red flags (e.g., weight loss, inability to find a comfortable position) prompts a more aggressive evaluation. A careful medical assessment for non-spinal “mimics” of spinal disorders, including abdominal aortic aneurysm, prostate disease or rheumatic disease, is appropriate in many patients with persistent back pain.

The search for a precise anatomic cause of the patient’s pain is complicated by the poor correlation between abnormal imaging findings on MRI or CT and symptoms. Determining whether to assign symptomatic to a particular finding in a patient with chronic back pain often is the key issue for the clinician. Results of diagnostic injections, such as facet blocks, selective discography or selective nerve blocks, must be carefully considered in the context of the patient’s symptoms and co-existing psychosocial view. For example, recent studies have demonstrated the unreliability of discography in patients with non-organic issues.

Finally, previous treatment in people with chronic back pain must be carefully assessed. Excessively passive treatment of acute low back pain delays recovery and promotes de-conditioning, sick role behavior and fear of re-injury. Ensuring that patients have an adequate trial of aggressive non-operative treatment incorporating active therapy and appropriate medication is important prior to pursuing more invasive surgical therapy in most patients.


Low Back Pain (LBP): Diagnostic Steps
How to Determine when a Pain in the Neck is More than That
Spondylosis
Doctors of Chiropractic: Finding the Right Specialist
Adult Scoliosis: Diagnostic Process
Articles from the Cleveland Clinic
Article written 00/00/0000
Published online 08/11/2005
Last updated 03/18/2009

SpineUniverse.com is a world leading site for back and neck information. All information and images included herein are
© 1999-2006 SpineUniverse.com and its licensors.