professional>resources>SRS> 

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire for Idiopathic Scoliosis

Abstract from the SRS 2001 Annual Meeting

Marc Asher, MD
Sue Min Lai, PhD
Douglas Burton, MD
Barbara Manna, RN

· (c - Depuy Acromed) University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility and internal consistency of the SRS-22 outcome survey.

METHODS: This study was carried out using mail-in questionnaires of the SRS-22 and the SF-36 outcomes instruments. These questionnaires were mailed to 83 patients who had been previously surgically treated for idiopathic scoliosis at this medical center. Fifty-eight of the eighty-three subjects responded. Fifty-one of the first-time respondents also returned their second survey. The 48 responders had an average age of 25 years (range 19 - 43) and 84% were female. The average response time between the first and the second mail-in assessments was 28 days. The time interval between the surgery and SRS-22 survey was 10.8 years. Individual domain scores were evaluated with descriptive statistics, internal consistency with the Cronbach a, test and re-test reproducibility with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and concurrent validity with Pearson Coefficient Correlation (r).

RESULTS: The average domain scores (5 being the best and 1 the worst), based on a sample of 58 responses were 4.2 for pain, 4.2 for self-image, 4.2 for function, 4.1 for mental health, and 4.5 for satisfaction. The calculated Cronbach a of internal consistency for the five corresponding domains was pain 0.92, self image 0.75, function 0.86, mental health 0.98, and satisfaction 0.88. Test/retest intra class correlations (n=51) were pain 0.96, self image 0.90, function 0.90, mental health 0.87, and satisfaction 0.85. The calculated Cronbach a and ICC for the SF-36 domains are quite compatible to those observed for the SRS-22. Concurrent validity was r 0.70 or more for 14 relevant SF-36 domains.

CONCLUSION: The SRS-22 has score distribution similar to the SF-36, is reliable (internally consistent and reproducible) and valid in comparison to SF-36.


Do Outcome Parameters Correlate with Surgical Complications Utilizing the SRS Questionnaire in the Treatment of AIS?
Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis via Selective Anterior Instrumentation and Fusion
Results of Anterior Instrumentation for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Patient Base Outcomes: The SRS Instrument
Physical and Radiographic Findings Correlate with SRS Instrument in Nonsurgical Idiopathic Scoliosis
Fixed Lumbar Apical Vertebral Rotation Predicts Spinal Decompensation in Lenke III C Type Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis After Posterior Thoracic Correction and Fusion
Article written 00/00/0000
Published online 06/21/2002
Last updated: 06/13/2005

 

SpineUniverse.com is a world leading site for back and neck information. All information and images included herein are Copyright SpineUniverse.com and its licensors.