SpineUniverse Case Study Library

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Lower Extremity Pain in a 77-year-old Male

This case study is brought to you by:
What is this?

This surgeon is a consultant of Medtronic, but received no compensation for this case discussion.

Patient history

The patient is a 77-year-old Caucasian male. He underwent recent elective quadruple coronary artery bypass graft 12 months prior with good recovery.

He complains of bilateral buttock pain that radiates through his thighs and calves. Pain is exacerbated by standing and ambulation. He is unable to walk for more than 10 minutes or 2 to 3 blocks due to pain. He considers lower extremity pain to significantly affect his quality of life and has recently experienced weight gain due to inability to remain active.

Prior treatment

Previously treated with anti-inflammatory medicines and physical therapy

Examination results

  • Full lower extremity motor strength
  • Normal deep tendon reflexes and sensory exam
  • Negative straight leg raise

Pre-treatment images

 

pre-operative sagittal T2 MRI axial image, L4-L5; severe lumbar spinal stenosis secondary to hypertrophic ligamentum flavum, facet arthropathy

Figure 1. Pre-operative sagittal T2 MRI (left) and axial image at L4-L5 (right) demonstrates severe lumbar spinal stenosis secondary to hypertrophic ligamentum flavum and facet arthropathy.

Diagnosis

Multi-level lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication

Suggest Treatment

Indicate how you would treat this patient by completing the following brief survey. Your response will be added to our survey results below.

Treatment

Medtronic's METRx® System was used for minimally invasive hemilaminectomies, bilateral dorsal, and lateral recess decompression through a unilateral approach.

Medtronic's METRx(R) System

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Post-treatment images

post-operative sagittal T2 MRI, 18 months post-operative axial MRI at 18 months

Figure 2. Post-operative T2 MRI images at 18 months demonstrates continued adequate decompression of the thecal sac.

Medtronic Technology Featured
METRx® System

Michelson Technology at Work

 

 

Outcome

  • At 2 months post-operative, the patient's leg pain had completely resolved.
  • Over the next 12 months the patient had recurrence of progressive lower extremity pain with ambulation. Follow-up lumbar MRI failed to show any recurrent lumbar stenosis.
  • Given the patient's history of prior occlusive vascular disease, referral to vascular surgeon to investigate potential lower extremity vascular claudication was obtained. Vascular studies indicated aortoiliac disease with exercise-induced claudication. The patient elected not to undergo surgical intervention at this time.

Note to patients
As you read this, please keep in mind that all treatment and outcome results are specific to the individual patient. Results may vary. Complications, such as infection, blood loss, bowel or bladder problems, are some of the potential adverse risks. Please consult with y our physician for a complete list of indications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, clinical results, and other important medical information.

This therapy is not for everyone. Please consult your physician. A prescription is required. For further information, please call MEDTRONIC at (800) 876-3133.

Case Discussion

This case represents classic neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis, but it might be helpful to comment on the differential diagnosis and treatment. An important differential diagnosis is vascular claudication, which can be suspected by careful history and examination. Some elderly patients have co-existent vascular and neurogenic claudications. It is also important to rule out tandem cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis, presenting with gait difficulty and balance problems.

MRI confirmed the patient's moderate to severe lumbar spinal stenosis at L3-L4 and L4-L5 in the central canal and lateral recess that correlated with the patient's symptoms. Frequently, in patients with primary stenosis at the L4-L5 motion segment and above, the L5-S1 motion segment may also be involved with lateral recess and/or foraminal stenosis and it should not be overlooked during surgery. There is no evidence of instability on MRI but some patients show subtle spondylolisthesis on standing or flexion-extension radiographs that may change the treatment plan.

Once the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis is made, treatment options should be discussed with the patient. Even the Spine Patient Outcome Research Trial (SPORT) study on spinal stenosis showed better outcome with surgery than conservative treatment. The conservatively treated cohort fared reasonably well without any significant neurological sequelae.1 Conservative treatments, such as analgesics, anti-inflammatory medications, injections, and exercise are an option for patients with spinal stenosis without significant neurological deficits and the symptoms are not too severe to significantly affect the patient's quality of life. Only when and if the symptoms are severe and non-responsive to conservative treatment, is surgery indicated. The patient should make the decision to have or not to have surgery based on the literature, and benefits and risks of surgery, as informed by the surgeon.

Surgical options include decompression by open or minimally invasive (MIS) techniques. There is no solid evidence in the literature that MIS techniques are superior to traditional open techniques for long-term outcome, but if the surgeon is well-trained and experienced, MIS techniques can help facilitate the post-operative course. In theory, preserving the midline structures will help spinal column stability and cause less destruction to the paraspinal musculature.

In severe stenosis, a unilateral approach to decompress central and bilateral lateral recess stenosis becomes more technical and should be approached with caution. The author of this case should be congratulated for excellent management of the patient from initial diagnosis to appropriate treatment selection and ultimately, a good outcome for the patient.

Reference
1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie J, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An HS: Surgical versus non-surgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Eng J Med. 2008. 358:794-810.

SHOW MAIN MENU
SHOW SUB MENU
Cancel
Delete

Get new patient cases delivered to your inbox

Sign up for our healthcare professional eNewsletter, SpineMonitor.
Sign Up!