Analysis of Non-Ambulatory Neuromuscular Scoliosis Patients Surgically Treated to the Pelvis with Intraoperative Halo-Femoral Traction

Katsushi Takeshita, M.D.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
Tokyo, Japan
Lawrence G. Lenke, MD
The Jerome J. Gilden Professor of Orthopedic Surgery
Co-Chief Pediatric & Adult Spinal, Scoliosis & Reconstructive Surgery
St. Louis, MO
Keith Bridwell, MD
Orthopaedic Surgeon
Washington University School of Medicine
St. Louis, MO
et al
Abstract from the SRS 2005 Annual Meeting
o a - Medtronic Sofamor Danek, o d- Medtronic Sofamor Danek, o e- Medtronic Sofamor Danek

Summary: 40 non-ambulatory neuromuscular scoliosis patients treated with a T2-sacrum instrumented fusion were reviewed with 20 having intraoperative halo-femoral traction and 20 controls without. Averaged correction of pelvic obliquity was 79% in the halo-femoral group compared to 57% in the control group (p=0.015). Thus, intraoperative use of halo-femoral traction in these patients afforded both improved lumbar curve correction and pelvic obliquity correction without any associated complications.

Purpose: To compare patients treated with and without intraoperative halo-femoral traction (H-F TX) to assess correction of neuromuscular (NM) spinal deformity.

Methods: 40 patients with non-ambulatory NM scoliosis were treated with a T2-sacrum instrumented posterior spinal fusion (PSF). 20 patients (12 PSF-alone, 8 AFS/PSF) having intraoperative H-F Tx performed unilaterally on the high side iliac wing were compared to a control group of 20 (15 PSF-alone, 5 ASF/PSF) patients treated similarly except without H-F Tx. Each group had 14 patients with spastic scoliosis, and 6 patients with flaccid deformities and minimum 2-year follow-up for all patients (range 3- 12 years). Patients were positioned prone with an average of 25lbs (range 15-40) placed on the femoral traction pin until pelvic obliquity was corrected.

Results: Lumbar scoliosis averaged 87º (range 30-141º) in the H-F Tx group and 67º (range 32-108º) in the control group (p=0.012). Postoperatively, the lumbar Cobb in the H-F Tx group decreased to 35º (range 11-37º) as compared to 32º (range 4-72º) in the control group (p=0.181). Pelvic obliquity averaged 26º (range 8-47º) in the H-F Tx group, and 17º (range 4-49º) in the control group preop (p=0.017), and postop decreased to 6º (range 1-23º) in the H-F Tx group, while the control group averaged 7º (range 0-27º). Average correction of pelvic obliquity was 79% in the H-F Tx group compared to 57% in the control group (p=0.001). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications related to the use of the H-F Tx apparatus. Eliminating patients who had an ASF procedure produced similar correction results superior for the H-F Tx group for lumbar scoliosis (p=0.012) and pelvic obliquity (p<0 .0001) correction.

Conclusions: Intraoperative use of halo-femoral traction in non-ambulatory NM scoliosis patients provided significantly improved lumbar scoliosis and pelvic obliquity correction, without any perioperative complications.

Last Updated: 05/22/2006