Straight-Forward Versus Anatomic Trajectory of Thoracic Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical Analysis

Ronald A. Lehman, Jr.
Washington University Medical School
St. Louis, MO
David W. Polly, Jr., MD
Professor and Chief of Spine Service
University of Minnesota, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Minneapolis, MN
Timothy R. Kuklo, MD, JD
Associate Professor
Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery
Washington University School of Medicine
St. Louis, MO
et al
Abstract from the SRS 2002 Annual Meeting

PURPOSE: To investigate the optimal thoracic pedicle screw trajectory in terms of maximal insertional torque (MIT) and pullout strength (POS) for a straightforward (ST) trajectory (paralleling the vertebral endplate) versus an anatomic (AT) trajectory (directed along the true anatomic axis of the pedicle).

METHODS: Thirty fresh cadaveric thoracic vertebrae were harvested and evaluated with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to assess bone mineral density (BMD). Matched, fixed-head pedicle screws were then randomly assigned (left versus right) and placed using the straight-forward or anatomic trajectory under direct and fluoroscopic visualization. MIT was recorded for each screw revolution with a digital torque wrench. Pullout strength testing to failure was conducted with a servohydraulic testing device.

RESULTS: Average BMD was 632 ± 0.25 mg/cm2 (471-794 mg/cm2). The MIT for the straight-forward technique was 2.58 ± .14 (SE) in-lbs while the anatomic trajectory averaged 1.86 ± 0.14 (SE) in-lbs. The insertional torque at the neurocentral junction for the ST technique averaged 1.89 ± .17 (SE) in-lbs. (73% of MIT), while the AT trajectory averaged 1.39 ± .11 (SE) in-lbs (75% of MIT). POS for the ST technique was 610.87 ± 49.73 (SE) in-lbs., while the POS of the AT averaged 480.52 ± 53.79 (SE) in-lbs. Thus, the straight-forward technique (paralleling the endplate) results in a 39% increase in MIT (p=0.0005), and a 36% increase in MIT at the neurocentral junction (p=0.007). Additionally, the average insertional torque at the neurocentral junction for the straight-forward trajectory was equivalent to the MIT for the anatomic trajectory. A 27% increase in POS (p=0.034) was seen with the straight-forward technique. BMD did not correlate with peak insertional torque for either technique (p=0.118), but did correlate with POS for both the AT (p=0.025) and ST techniques (p=0.027).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The straight-forward technique results in a 39% increase in MIT (p=0.0005) and a 27% increase in POS (p=0.034) over the anatomic trajectory. The neurocentral junction provides approximately 75% of the MIT in the thoracic spine. BMD directly correlates with pullout strength, but not with insertional torque.

Last Updated: 09/08/2005