Biomechanical Effects of Posterior Lumbar Reconstruction on the Adjacent Segment
Poster from the SRS 2002 Annual Meeting
INTRODUCTION: To overcome the limitations of posterolateral fusion
(PLF) in maintaining lumbar lordosis, posterior lumbar
interbody fusion (PLIF) has been developed. This study compares
the biomechanical effects of three different posterior
reconstructions on the adjacent motion segment0and discusses indication
for PLF and PLIF.
METHODS: Ten calf spines (L3-S1) underwent non-destructive flexion-extension testing (±6 Nm). After testing intact specimens, destabilization was performed at L5-L6-S1 and followed by pedicle screw fixation (PS) with and without interbody cages as follows: 1) PS with straight rods [ in situ PLF], 2) PS with kyphotically pre-bent rods [kyphotic PLF], and 3) PS and interbody cages with straight rods [ in situ PLIF/PLF]. Construct stiffness of the operative segments, intradiscal pressure and longitudinal lamina strain at the upper adjacent segment (L4-L5) were analyzed.
RESULTS : Construct stiffness of the in situ PLIF/PLF was significantly higher compared to both in situ and kyphotic PLF, however, statistical significance was not detected between two PLFs. The in situ PLIF/PLF presented greater intradiscal pressure and lamina strain compared to in situ PLF under flexion loading. Higher intradiscal pressure and lamina strain exhibited by the kyphotic PLF compared to in situ PLF under extension, were further increased in the in situ PLIF/PLF group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study investigated the intradiscal pressure and lamina strain as parameters of biomechanical effects on the unfused adjacent segment and indirectly evaluated the load transmission through the anterior and posterior columns. The kyphotic PLF indicated higher intradiscal pressure and lamina strain compared to the in situ PLF, suggesting that local kyphosis of the operative segments causes excessive load on the cranial adjacent segment. Importantly, the in situ PLIF/PLF demonstrated greater intradiscal pressure and lamina strain at the adjacent segment compared to the kyphotic PLF. Hence, additional PLIF may lead to higher adjacent level load transmission through both anterior and posterior columns due to increased construct stiffness, even if local kyphosis is corrected by performing PLIF.
METHODS: Ten calf spines (L3-S1) underwent non-destructive flexion-extension testing (±6 Nm). After testing intact specimens, destabilization was performed at L5-L6-S1 and followed by pedicle screw fixation (PS) with and without interbody cages as follows: 1) PS with straight rods [ in situ PLF], 2) PS with kyphotically pre-bent rods [kyphotic PLF], and 3) PS and interbody cages with straight rods [ in situ PLIF/PLF]. Construct stiffness of the operative segments, intradiscal pressure and longitudinal lamina strain at the upper adjacent segment (L4-L5) were analyzed.
RESULTS : Construct stiffness of the in situ PLIF/PLF was significantly higher compared to both in situ and kyphotic PLF, however, statistical significance was not detected between two PLFs. The in situ PLIF/PLF presented greater intradiscal pressure and lamina strain compared to in situ PLF under flexion loading. Higher intradiscal pressure and lamina strain exhibited by the kyphotic PLF compared to in situ PLF under extension, were further increased in the in situ PLIF/PLF group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study investigated the intradiscal pressure and lamina strain as parameters of biomechanical effects on the unfused adjacent segment and indirectly evaluated the load transmission through the anterior and posterior columns. The kyphotic PLF indicated higher intradiscal pressure and lamina strain compared to the in situ PLF, suggesting that local kyphosis of the operative segments causes excessive load on the cranial adjacent segment. Importantly, the in situ PLIF/PLF demonstrated greater intradiscal pressure and lamina strain at the adjacent segment compared to the kyphotic PLF. Hence, additional PLIF may lead to higher adjacent level load transmission through both anterior and posterior columns due to increased construct stiffness, even if local kyphosis is corrected by performing PLIF.
Last Updated: 06/21/2005
Manage Your Practice
Practice Marketing
Practice Website Development
SpineUniverse Premium Membership
Online Advertising
Practice Management Articles
eNewsletter Signup
Patient Ed Handouts/InfoRx Pads
Update Your Practice Listing
Education
Clinical Trials
Primary Care
Technology
Research & Abstracts
Pathology
Anatomy - Cervical
Anatomy - Thoracic
Anatomy - Lumbar
Biomechanics
Congenital
Deformity - Cervical
Deformity - Thoracic
Deformity - Lumbar
Infection
Inflammation
Pain
Trauma - Cervical
Trauma - Thoracic
Trauma - Lumbar
Tumor - Cervical
Tumor - Thoracic
Tumor - Lumbar
Vascular
For Patients









