The Efficacy of Three Different Commercially Available Demineralized Bone Matrices for Inducing an Intertransverse Spinal Fusion in a Rat Model
Poster from the SRS 2002 Annual Meeting
· (a Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation)
This study directly compared the efficacy of three different demineralized bone matrix (DBM) products for inducing spinal fusion in a rat model. Athymic rats were implanted with Allomatrix (Wright Medical), DBX (MTF), or Grafton (Osteotech). L4 and L5 transverse processes were decorticated and 0.3 cc of graft was implanted bilaterally. Animals were sacrificed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, at which time radiographic, histologic, and biomechanical analyses of the explanted spines were performed.
Using a radiographic scoring system, no spines were fused at 2 weeks. At 4 and 8 weeks the Grafton and DBX groups had more radiographic fusions than Allomatrix but a significant difference was only noted between Grafton and Allomatrix (p<0.05). Manual testing revealed that the Grafton group fused more frequently than the DBX and Allomatrix groups at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. This study demonstrates that there are differences in the osteoinductive potentials of commercially available DBMs.
This study directly compared the efficacy of three different demineralized bone matrix (DBM) products for inducing spinal fusion in a rat model. Athymic rats were implanted with Allomatrix (Wright Medical), DBX (MTF), or Grafton (Osteotech). L4 and L5 transverse processes were decorticated and 0.3 cc of graft was implanted bilaterally. Animals were sacrificed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, at which time radiographic, histologic, and biomechanical analyses of the explanted spines were performed.
Using a radiographic scoring system, no spines were fused at 2 weeks. At 4 and 8 weeks the Grafton and DBX groups had more radiographic fusions than Allomatrix but a significant difference was only noted between Grafton and Allomatrix (p<0.05). Manual testing revealed that the Grafton group fused more frequently than the DBX and Allomatrix groups at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. This study demonstrates that there are differences in the osteoinductive potentials of commercially available DBMs.
Last Updated: 10/13/2005
Manage Your Practice
Practice Marketing
Practice Website Development
SpineUniverse Premium Membership
Online Advertising
Practice Management Articles
eNewsletter Signup
Patient Ed Handouts/InfoRx Pads
Update Your Practice Listing
Education
Clinical Trials
Primary Care
Technology
Research & Abstracts
Pathology
Anatomy - Cervical
Anatomy - Thoracic
Anatomy - Lumbar
Biomechanics
Congenital
Deformity - Cervical
Deformity - Thoracic
Deformity - Lumbar
Infection
Inflammation
Pain
Trauma - Cervical
Trauma - Thoracic
Trauma - Lumbar
Tumor - Cervical
Tumor - Thoracic
Tumor - Lumbar
Vascular
For Patients









