Use of Amicar vs. Aprotinin During Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: Can they Help Decrease Blood Loss?

Jennifer Cole, M.D.
Dept Pediatric Anesthesiology
Washington University
St. Louis, MO
David Murray, M.D.
Dept Pediatric Anesthesiology
Washington University
St. Louis, MO
Lawrence G. Lenke, MD
The Jerome J. Gilden Professor of Orthopedic Surgery
Co-Chief Pediatric & Adult Spinal, Scoliosis & Reconstructive Surgery
St. Louis, MO
et al
Abstract from the SRS 2002 Annual Meeting
Purpose: Our goal was to prospectively examine two groups of pediatric spinal deformity patients undergoing spinal fusion: “low-risk” and “high-risk” with respect to anticipated intraop blood loss, in order to determine the efficacy of randomly administered antifibrinolytics Amicar and Aprotinin in decreasing blood loss and transfusion requirements vs. a placebo control.

Methods: 47 pts in the “low-risk” group (e.g. idiopathic patients undergoing single stage ASF or PSF) were randomly assigned to receive Amicar (n=27, bolus of 150mg/kg pre-incision and 15mg/kg infusion cont. to 4 hrs. postop) or placebo (n=20). The mean age was 13+9 years and mean weight was 52.4 kg. 43 pts in the “high-risk” group (e.g. neuromuscular pts fused long to the pelvis) were randomized to receive Aprotinin (n=20, 240mg/m2 loading dose pre-incision and 56mg/m2 infusion cont. to 4 hrs. postop) or placebo (n=23). The mean age was 12+8 years and mean weight was 39.5 kg. Data assessed included estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusions from both cell-saver and units of blood both intraop and periop, and ending HCT. The entire operating room team (surgeons and anesthesiologists) were blinded to the drug groups provided.

Results: In the “low-risk” arm, there was no difference in Amicar vs. placebo in calculated blood loss (891cc vs. 874cc, p>.05); #PRBCs transfused (1.5 vs. 2.0, p>.05); and ending HCT (28.2% vs. 28.3%). In the “high-risk” arm, there were significant differences in the Aprotinin vs. placebo group in calculated blood loss (1190cc vs. 2158cc, p<.05); #PRBCs transfused (1.3 vs. 2.3, p<.05); amount of cell saver blood returned to the patient (81cc vs. 293cc, p<.05); while the ending HCT for both groups was the same (29.1% vs. 29.4%).

Conclusions: In “low-risk” pediatric patients having spinal deformity surgery, no difference in blood loss or transfusion requirements were observed when Amicar was administered vs. placebo. However, in “high-risk” patients, Aprotinin significantly reduced blood loss and transfusion exposures during spinal deformity surgery vs. placebo.

This study was funded completely by the OREF.
Last Updated: 04/26/2005