An Analysis of Patient and Parent Assessment of Deformity in Idiopathic Scoliosis Using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale
Abstract from the SRS 2002 Annual Meeting
· (a – Medtronic Sofamor Danek)
Purpose: While patients perceptions of their deformity are a major aspect of idiopathic scoliosis, they are difficult to measure. The Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) demonstrates 7 visible aspects of spinal deformity in an analogue scale. Higher scores reflect worsening deformity. This study evaluates the scale compared to clinical parameters and written descriptions of the deformity from idiopathic scoliosis patients and their parents.
Methods: The WRVAS was administered to 182 idiopathic scoliosis patients at 4 centers in conjunction with categorized responses regarding demographics, curve characteristics, and open-ended questions about patients and their parents perceptions of their spinal deformity. The open-ended responses were categorized as either deformity noted or no deformity noted. Significance was selected at p=0.05.
Results: WRVAS scores strongly correlate with curve magnitude (p=.01) and clearly differentiates curves of >30° from lesser curves. Among treatment groups, patients without scoliosis, and patients observed, braced, or postoperative had significantly lower scores than those with surgery recommended. The instrument differentiated those noting no deformity from those noting a deformity. The correlation between patients and parents scores was high (Spearmans rho=0.8). If neither the parent nor child noted a deformity, parents scores were not significantly different than the patients. However, when a deformity was noted, parents gave higher scores than their children for rib prominence, shoulder level, scapular rotation, and the total score, but not for the other dimensions.
Conclusions: Increasing scores of the WRVAS are strongly correlated with curve magnitude lending construct validity to this type of assessment tool. Patients with surgery recommended report more visible deformity on the scale than observed, braced, and postoperative patients supporting the hypothesis that surgery improves the perceived appearance. Parents perceive more deformity of the ribs, and shoulders more than the patients, but other aspects of the deformity are identified equally.
· If noted, the author indicates something of value received. The codes are identified as: a-research or institutional support; b-miscellaneous funding; c-royalties; d-stock options.
Purpose: While patients perceptions of their deformity are a major aspect of idiopathic scoliosis, they are difficult to measure. The Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) demonstrates 7 visible aspects of spinal deformity in an analogue scale. Higher scores reflect worsening deformity. This study evaluates the scale compared to clinical parameters and written descriptions of the deformity from idiopathic scoliosis patients and their parents.
Methods: The WRVAS was administered to 182 idiopathic scoliosis patients at 4 centers in conjunction with categorized responses regarding demographics, curve characteristics, and open-ended questions about patients and their parents perceptions of their spinal deformity. The open-ended responses were categorized as either deformity noted or no deformity noted. Significance was selected at p=0.05.
Results: WRVAS scores strongly correlate with curve magnitude (p=.01) and clearly differentiates curves of >30° from lesser curves. Among treatment groups, patients without scoliosis, and patients observed, braced, or postoperative had significantly lower scores than those with surgery recommended. The instrument differentiated those noting no deformity from those noting a deformity. The correlation between patients and parents scores was high (Spearmans rho=0.8). If neither the parent nor child noted a deformity, parents scores were not significantly different than the patients. However, when a deformity was noted, parents gave higher scores than their children for rib prominence, shoulder level, scapular rotation, and the total score, but not for the other dimensions.
Conclusions: Increasing scores of the WRVAS are strongly correlated with curve magnitude lending construct validity to this type of assessment tool. Patients with surgery recommended report more visible deformity on the scale than observed, braced, and postoperative patients supporting the hypothesis that surgery improves the perceived appearance. Parents perceive more deformity of the ribs, and shoulders more than the patients, but other aspects of the deformity are identified equally.
· If noted, the author indicates something of value received. The codes are identified as: a-research or institutional support; b-miscellaneous funding; c-royalties; d-stock options.
Last Updated: 04/25/2005
Manage Your Practice
Practice Marketing
Practice Management Articles
SpineUniverse Premium Membership
Targeted Practice Promotion
Practice Website Development
eNewsletter Signup
Patient Handouts/Rx Pads
Update Practice Listing
Education
Clinical Trials
Primary Care
Technology
Research & Abstracts
Pathology
Anatomy - Cervical
Anatomy - Thoracic
Anatomy - Lumbar
Biomechanics
Congenital
Deformity - Cervical
Deformity - Thoracic
Deformity - Lumbar
Infection
Inflammation
Pain
Trauma - Cervical
Trauma - Thoracic
Trauma - Lumbar
Tumor - Cervical
Tumor - Thoracic
Tumor - Lumbar
Vascular
For Patients










