Does Correction of Preoperative Coronal Imbalance Make a Difference In Outcomes of Adult Deformity Patients?

Michael Daubs, MD
Washington University
Lawrence G. Lenke, MD
The Jerome J. Gilden Professor of Orthopedic Surgery
Co-Chief Pediatric & Adult Spinal, Scoliosis & Reconstructive Surgery
St. Louis, MO
Yongjung J. Kim, MD
Gene Cheh, M.D.
Poster from the 2006 SRS Annual Meeting
Background: There are few studies evaluating the treatment or affect of coronal imbalance on adult deformity patient outcomes. Prior studies have suggested that the severity of coronal imbalance postoperativley was insignificant.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and radiographic results of deformity surgery on patients with greater than 4cm of coronal imbalance.

Methods: 36 patients, mean age 51 years(range 18-77) with at least 4cm of preoperative coronal imbalance who underwent a thoracic/lumbar fusion for deformity correction were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 49 months(range 24-124). Radiographs were measured pre-operatively, post-operatively, and at last follow-up. Outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index(ODI).

Results: The average pre-op coronal imbalance was 61mm(range 40-142), and corrected post-op to an average of 35mm(range 0-84)(p<0 .0001) for an average correction of 43%. 89%(32/36) patients had postoperative improvement their coronal imbalance. Oswestry scores improved by a mean 15 points, 45 to 30(p< 0.0001). The were divided into three groups based on the C7 plumb line measurements at last follow-up: 0-2cm(n="9);" 2-4cm(n="14)," and>4cm(13) of coronal imbalance. There were no significant differences in the 3 groups in regard to the severity of the pre-op coronal imbalance, or their pre-op and post-op ODI scores. All three groups had significant improvement in ODI scores(p<0 .05).

Conclusion: There was significant improvement in clinical outcomes following surgical treatment of patients with > 4cm of coronal imbalance. There was no significant difference in outcomes based on the severity of the residual imbalance whether it was greater or less than 4cm. However,89%(32/36) had significant postoperative improvement in their coronal imbalance(p<0 .001). This data suggests that the absolute amount of residual postoperative coronal imbalance may not be as important a factor in patient outcomes is fact there was significant improvement their balance.

Last Updated: 03/12/2007