Electrodiagnostic Tools
Nerve Conduction Studies, Electromyography and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials: Part 2
Electrodiagnostic studies, including, nerve conduction studies (NCS), needle electromyography (EMG), and somatosensory evoked potential studies (SSEPs) should be considered an extension of the history and physical examination and not merely a substitute for a detailed neurologic and musculoskeletal examination.
These studies are helpful in the evaluation of patients with limb pain where the diagnosis remains unclear (e.g. perineal neuropathy versus a radiculopathy). They are also helpful in excluding other causes of sensory and motor disturbances, such as peripheral neuropathy and motor neuron disease. They can also provide useful prognostic information by quantifying the extent and acuity of axonal involvement in radiculopathies.
H-Reflex and F Waves
Performing late response
such as the H-reflex can provide valuable information regarding the proximal
nerve/nerve root involvement. The H-reflex is both a sensitive and specific
marker for involvement of the S1 root. F waves, also used to detect abnormalities
in the proximal portion of nerves, are too nonspecific to be clinically useful
in the setting of radiculopathy. Electrodiagnostic testing is usually not necessary
in a clear-cut radiculopathy or in patients with isolated mechanical low back
symptoms. Furthermore, these studies do not assess the smaller myelinated and
unmyelinated nerve fibers, which are typically responsible for pain transmission.
SSEPs
Somatosensory evoked potential studies are of limited value in the assessment
of acute low back pain and radiculopathy. They are not indicated unless there
are neurologic signs and symptoms suggestive of pathology, which would indicate
involvement of the somatosensory pathways. Some have found dermatomal and motor
evoked potentials helpful in the diagnosis of spinal stenosis, but these are
not routinely employed in clinical practice.
Find A Professional in Your Area


