Can Idiopathic Scoliosis Fusion Improve Aerobic Efficiency During Exercise?
L.G. Lenke, M.D.
J.S. Kemp, M.D.
K.H. Bridwell, M.D.
K.M. Blanke, R.N.
J.R. Engsberg, Ph.D.
Washington University School of Medicine, Dept of Orthopaedic
Surgery
Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Pulmonary Function Lab
Barnes-Jewish Hospital,
Human Performance Laboratory
St. Louis University Hospital; St. Louis, MO, USA
INTRODUCTION:
For reasons that are unclear, untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
(AIS) patients approach their ventilatory ceiling during maximal aerobic exercise
despite only small restrictions in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory
volume in one second (FEV1). This inefficiency of ventilation with exercise may
explain the reluctance of AIS patients to pursue aerobic fitness.
PURPOSE:
To
prospectively evaluate pulmonary function, maximal O2 consumption and ventilatory
efficiency during exercise in AIS patients preop and a minimum 2 years postop,
to see if aerobic inefficiency can be improved following surgery.
METHODS:
42
AIS patients were prospectively evaluated preop and a minimum of 2 years following
spinal fusion. There were 36 females and 6 males with an average age of 14+3 (range
10+7 through 17+11). 17 underwent PSF alone, 20 an ASF alone, 5 both an ASF and
PSF. All patients had standard spirometry for evaluation of FVC and total lung
capacity (TLC), as well as cycle ergometry to assess aerobic capacities via maximal
oxygen consumption (VO2max), and aerobic efficiency at VO2max (VE/MVV). Preop
and postop results were compared by paired T-tests.
RESULTS:
| FVC (% Pred) |
TLC (% Pred) |
RV/TLC |
VO2max (L) |
% Pred VO2max |
VE/MVV |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preop | 88.1 |
90.5 |
.25 |
1.87 |
.94 |
.76 |
| 1 Yr Postop | 81.4* |
88.5 |
.28* |
1.81 |
.85* |
.68* |
| P-Value | <.0001 |
.189 |
<.0001 |
.521 |
<.003 |
<.0005 |
There was a statistical decline in FVC, without any change in TLC. The RV/TLC ratio suggests air trapping in the spirometry results. Although the absolute value of VO2max was unchanged, the % Predicted VO2max statistically declined following surgery. In addition, aerobic efficiency as measured by efficiency of ventilation (VE/MVV) declined at 2 years postop. Evaluation using an Oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) which reflects ventilatory efficiency with exercise independent of effort, demonstrated that these aerobic inefficiencies could not be accounted for solely based on poor patient effort.
CONCLUSIONS:
Although there was no difference
in absolute maximum oxygen consumption during exercise, aerobic efficiency of
ventilation during exercise statistically declined following AIS fusion surgery.
Measures should be investigated to improve aerobic fitness in postop AIS patients
long-term.









