Dural Ectasia (DE) and Plain Radiography in the Marfan Lumbosacral Spine
L. Nallamshetty, B.S.
Uri M. Ahn, M.D.
J. Buchowski, M.D.
P.S. Rose M.D.
E.S. Garrett, Ph.D.
K.M. Kebaish, M.D.
Paul D. Sponseller, M.D.
Johns Hopkins
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
INTRODUCTION:
Dural
ectasia (DE) is a ballooning or expansion of the dural sac commonly seen in the
lumbosacral spine of patients with Marfan syndrome. It has been shown that DE
in Marfan is associated with severe low back pain and headaches, and neurologic
deficits such as weakness and loss of bowel and bladder function. For these reasons,
increased attention has been directed towards screening for DE in this population.
MRI is the gold standard for detecting DE in Marfan with a sensitivity and specificity
over 90%; CT has values over 80%. However, these tests are costly, and MRI is
often unavailable because of prosthetic heart valves for associated cardiac disease.
Plain radiographs are an inexpensive and simple means of evaluating the lumbar
spine. The purpose of this study was to determine if plain radiography can accurately
detect DE in Marfan. This is the only study in the literature examining the utility
of plain x-rays in making this diagnosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Fifty patients
with Marfan syndrome as defined by the Ghent criteria aged 30-50 participated
in this study. The study population included 25 Marfan patients with DE and 25
age- and sex-matched Marfan patients without DE. Plain films of the lumbosacral
spine were taken and five measurements were made at each level from L1-S1: interpediculate
distance (IPD), scalloping value (SV), sagittal canal diameter (SCD), vertebral
body width, and transverse process width. Pre-existing MRI scans were available
in all patients and used as gold standards for the presence or absence of DE.
RESULTS:
The measurements most significantly associated with DE were: IPD at the
L4; SV at L5; SCD at S1. Criteria were developed based on these values using an
analysis of variance to generate "critical values" for each measurement. These
final criteria included the presence of one of the following: IPD at L4 > 38.0
mm; SCD at S1 > 18.0 mm; or SV at L5 > 5.5 mm. Using these criteria against the
gold standard MRI scans, plain radiography was found to detect DE in Marfan with
a very high specificity (92%) but a lower sensitivity (76%).
CONCLUSION:
Dural
ectasia in Marfan syndrome is commonly associated with several osseous changes
that are observable on conventional radiographs of the lumbosacral spine. Conventional
radiography can detect DE in patients with Marfan syndrome with a very high specificity
and a reasonably high sensitivity. Thus, if the criteria are met on plain radiographs,
one should have a high index of suspicion that DE is present. Consideration should
therefore be given to using plain radiography as a screening tool in Marfan patients
with symptoms consistent with DE.









