Surgical Management of Spinal Deformities in Neurofibromatosis: A Correlation Between Modulation and Surgical Outcome
A.H. Crawford, M.D.
TR Morley, F.R.C.S.
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
PURPOSE:
To critically analyze the influence
of modulation of the outcome of surgical management of spinal deformities in NF1
and evaluate the effect of various dystrophic radiographic features.
MATERIALS
& METHODS:
Clinical records, operative data and radiographic were reviewed on
39 patients (21 males 18 females) with Neurofibromatosis-1 who underwent a spinal
fusion at our institutions between 1991 to 1996. The mean follow-up was 59 months.
Deformities were categorized as either non dystrophic (n=9) when no radiographic
dystrophic features were present, modulated (n=21) when a deformity acquired dystrophic
features and dystrophic (n=9) when there were 3 or more dystrophic features present
at the time of presentation. Nine radiographic features including vertebral wedging
(n=18), vertebral rotation (n=12), lateral vertebral scalloping (n=1), spindled
transverse processes (n=7), wide interpedicular distances (n=8), wide intervetebral
foramina (n=5) and rib penciling n=28) were recorded to determine their influence
on the surgical outcome. Spinal neurofibromas were present in 29 patients in this
series. 11 patients underwent only a posterior spinal fusion while 28 patients
had both anterior & posterior spinal fusion done. Exact Wilcoxon rank sum and
Kruskal Walis rank sum tests were performed for statistical analysis.
RESULTS:
The mean preoperative deformity measured 68° for the non-dystrophic group, 75º
for the modulators and 76º for the dystrophic group. Postoperatively the deformity
measured at a mean of 43º for the non-dystrophic group, 48º for the modulators
and 46º for the dystrophic group. At the final follow-up the mean deformity measured
49º in the non-dystrophic group, 62º for the modulators and 53º for the dystrophic
variety (p=0.9). Five patients developed pseudoarthrosis in our series, 4 were
modulators and one in the non dystrophic group. The Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test
to determine the influence of dystrophic radiographic features on the surgical
outcome failed to reach statistical significance for any of the above mentioned
features individually. Presence of a spinal neurofibroma also failed to influence
the surgical outcome by Exact Wilcoxon rank tests (p=0.961). Penciling of three
ribs did significantly influence the outcome (p=0.015).
CONCLUSION:
Our results
suggest that modulated deformities share the same risk of postoperative loss of
correction following spinal fusion as seen in the dystrophic deformities. An increased
incidence of pseudarthrosis was observed in the deformities showing modulation.









