Can Triggered EMG Thresholds Accurately Predict Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement?
Lawrence G. Lenke, MD
Yongjung Kim, MD
Keith H. Bridwell, MD
Darrell S. Hanson, MD
Anne M. Padberg, MS
Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
PURPOSE:
Triggered EMG stimulation with lower extremity myogenic
recordings has proven helpful in identifying medially placed lumbar pedicle screws.
Use of intercostal muscle recordings for thoracic pedicle screw placement has
proven non-specific in an animal model. This study focuses on the use of the rectus
abdominis muscles as a recording site for screws placed in spinal levels T6-12
to determine the efficacy of using triggered electromyographic threshold stimulation
(TrgEMG) to assess positioning of thoracic pedicle screws.
METHODS:
501 thoracic
pedicle screws were placed in 70 consecutive patients (July 1999 through February
2001). All screws placed between T6 & T12 were evaluated using an ascending method
of stimulation to record a compound muscle action potential from rectus abdominis
muscles bilaterally. The lowest intensity TrgEMG threshold in each patient resulted
in screw removal & a recheck of all pedicle borders by careful palpation at that
spinal level.
RESULTS:
There were 5 thoracic screws (Group A) with medial wall
breakthrough confirmed by tactile, visual and/or radiographic inspection. TrgEMG
thresholds for these screws were all 6.0 mA. 10 appropriately placed screws also
had thresholds 6.0 mA (Group B) and were rechecked with intraoperative confirmation
of intact medial walls. 486 screws had TrgEMG thresholds 6.0mA (Group C). Due
to the lack of absolute threshold value consensus, each threshold 6.0mA (Groups
A & B) was compared to the mean of all other TrgEMG responses obtained within
each individual patient. The percentage of decrease from this mean was calculated
for each low threshold. Group A screws (n=5) had a mean percentage decrease of
66.7%(range 46.1-76.8). Group B screws had a mean percentage decrease of 50.5
% (range 34.7-62.3). A two-sample t-test demonstrated a statistically significant
difference between the two mean values (p = 0.0130). Due to the small sample size
in both groups, this should be viewed as a trend rather than an absolute indication.
CONCLUSIONS:
Similar to lumbar pedicle screw stimulation, thoracic pedicle screw
(T6-T12) stimulation with rectus abdominis recordings can provide important information
on the integrity of the medial pedicle wall. Suspicion for medially placed screws
should arise when the TrgEMG is 6.0mA; however, that threshold is not absolute
confirmation of medial wall breakthrough.









