Deformity and Scoliosis
Making the Right Choices in the Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Patient's Guide - Appearance
Progressive deformity and dissatisfaction with appearance are also important concerns for patients and family members. At least half of all adults with scoliosis identify dissatisfaction with appearance as the reason for seeking surgical care. Accurate data on the psychosocial effects of scoliosis and deformity on self-image and social role are limited, and largely individualized. Long-term studies demonstrate a poor correlation between the location or degree of a curve and the extent of psychosocial complaints. For patients with AIS, the influence of surgery for deformity on self-image and satisfaction with appearance varies and is difficult to predict. Surgical treatment of deformity does not have a reliable effect in improving self-image or satisfaction with appearance.
Neurologic Compromise
Progressive neurological deterioration is not characteristic of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and development of late parapelegia is extremely rare. Degenerative changes of the spine associated with adult deformity may lead to progressive radicular pain patterns or to spinal stenosis. Congenital deformity and scoliosis due to neuromuscular syndromes are characterized by progressive neurologic deterioration with curve progression. The presence of a neurologic abnormality with scoliosis will alert the care provider to look for an intraspinal abnormality as neurologic disturbance is not a characteristic sequelae of idiopathic scoliosis.
Surgical Techniques
Surgical techniques continue to evolve in the management of scoliosis. For certain curve types the surgeon is able to gain significant curve correction while preserving much of the mobility of the spine. Minimally invasive techniques also allow us to minimize the morbidity of anterior approaches to the spine. In considering early surgical management options for AIS, one advantage is the availability of techniques for minimizing fusion levels that may not be useful in later stages of the deformity. Again, patients and families' discussion with the care provider should include an understanding of whether continued non-operative care may compromise future surgical options.
Conclusion: Choices in the management of AIS should be made with participation of the patient, family, and care provider. The goal of this article is to outline a few of the topics that are important in considering management options, and to encourage the readers to pursue more information with their care providers. Without information, choices cannot be made, and management becomes prescribed. Ultimately an informed patient who participates in management decisions is most likely to be satisfied with the outcome of management.














