SpineUniverse Community Advice
Get help and share your story with others who know what you're going through.
Please register or log in to join the discussions!

XLIF surgery verses postior surgery

Started by 689973710@facebook on 06/28/2012 9:25am

I already have a fusion from L3toL5 with plates and screws. I need to have another fusion L2-L3. Would it be better to have the XLIF minimal invasive surgery that goes through the side or have the open surgery that goes through the back. I have spinal stenosis and disc degenaration. This will be my thrid back surgery. Any help with this would be great. Thanks

Do you find this discussion helpful?

1 Response


Hi, sounds like I wrote your request, I am so similar. I have a 7 year old fusion S1-L5, now I have severe spondylolesthesis and stenosis above the fusion, as well as herniation at L4-L2. I also had a L3-4 Laminotomy and discectomy 2 years ago. I've seen 3 surgeons, and have 3 opinions of how to approach the surgery. One said she would do an XLIF with plating, leaving the old fusion in place and attaching new hardware to fuse L3-4 to the old one. The second said he would do an anterior surgery to attach a new fusion L3-4 to the old fusion. The third said he felt the best would be an anterior surgery to remove the old hardware and replace the fusion from S1-L2. This would be my third surgery as well. I had made up my mind to go with the surgeon who would remove the old hardware and replace with a new extended fusion, and then I saw this website......... I would appreciate any ideas, opinions, suggestions, anyone who has been through this situation would have. No horror stories, please, I am already scared enough. Thanks! I just want to be fixed.......