|
DYNAMIC SAGITTAL IMBALANCE
OF THE SPINE IN DEGENERATIVE FLAT BACK: SIGNIFICANCE OF PELVIC TILT IN
SURGICAL TREATMENT
ChoonSung Lee,
YungTae Kim,
JeongHyun Yoo,
ChoonKi Lee
University of Ulsan and Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
BACKGROUND:
Degenerative flat back, a common spinal deformity in oriental countries,
is a typical example of sagittal spinal imbalance causing serious disability
due to stooping of the trunk. Sagittal imbalance in degenerative flat
back is usually more evident on walking, suggesting its dynamic nature.
Surgical correction of degenerative flat back is often accompanied by
various complications. The most puzzling is postoperative persistent stooping
despite restoration of sufficient lumbar lordosis by corrective surgery.
The purpose of this study was to elucidate the cause of the postoperative
persistent stooping.
METHODS :
A tool practically available for evaluation of dynamic imbalance was gait
analysis. Twenty seven patients, who had been operated after gait analysis
from 1995 to 1997, were divided into two groups according to the level
of postoperative improvement in stooping: twenty two patients with marked
improvement in stooping and five patients with persistent stooping. In
order to determine the cause of the persistent stooping, various radiographic
and gait (sagittal kinematic and kinetic) parameters were compared between
the two groups.
RESULTS:
All the radiographic parameters were not significantly different between
the two groups (p > 0.05). On the other hand, in kinematic gait data,
anterior pelvic tilt was significantly increased in those patients with
persistent stooping, along with greater hip and knee flexion (p < 0.05).
In kinetic gait data, hip extensor moment was also significantly increased
in these patients.
DISCUSSION:
Marked degeneration and weakness of lumbar extensor muscles were demonstrated
in most patients with degenerative flat back. In these patients, posterior
pelvic tilt has been considered to be the most important compensatory
mechanism to overcome stooping from sagittal imbalance. We observed that
this compensatory mechanism was lost in some patients. Extensive weakness
of pelvic as well as lumbar extensor muscles was presumed to be responsible
for this loss of pelvic compensatory mechanism, i.e., posterior pelvic
tilt.
CONCLUSION:
Degenerative flat back could be classified into two types based on pelvic
position during walking : one with posterior pelvic tilt, and the other
with marked anterior pelvic tilt. In the former type, corrective surgery
could improve the stooping. In the latter, in which pelvic compensatory
mechanism was lost, corrective surgery was usually ineffective, resulting
in postoperative persistent stooping. This study demonstrated that not
all the patients with degenerative flat back were candidates for corrective
surgery.
|
|