|
THE EFFECT OF TRANSPEDICULAR
INTRACORPORAL GRAFTING IN THE TREATMENT THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES
ON CANAL REMODELING
Ahmet Alanay,
Emre Acaroglu,
Muharram Yazici,
Adil Surat Sihhiye,
Ankara, Turkey
PURPOSE:
Transpedicular intracorporal grafting in combination with short segment
instrumentation has been offered as an alternative to prevent failure.
The concern still exists about the potential complication of further canal
narrowing or failure of remodeling with this technique. This study prospectively
evaluated canal remodeling in patients treated with transpedicular intracorporal
grafting.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Twentyone patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were randomized
into transpedicular grafting (TPG) (n=11) and nonTPG (NTPG) (n=10) groups
and were prospectively followed for an average of 50 months (25 85).
Groups were similar for age, type of fracture, load sharing classification
and kyphotic deformity. Preoperative, postoperative and followup CT images
through the level of pedicles were obtained, corrected for differences
in magnification, and digitized. Areas of the spinal canals were measured
and normalized by the estimated area at that level (average of adjacent
levels).
RESULTS:
There were no operative complications in any of the groups. Average sagittal
index was 19.7±6.2 degrees at presentation, was corrected to 1.9±4.9 degrees
by operation, but was found to have been deteriorated to 9.1+6.4 degrees
at final followup. There were no differences between groups regarding
the evolution of sagittal deformity. Spinal canal narrowing was 38.5±18.2
% at presentation, 22.1±19.8 % postop, and further improved to 2.5±16.7
% at followup, similar for both groups (Table 1).
|
Canal narrowing
|
TPG
|
NTPG
|
P value
|
|
Preoperative
|
40.5±16.9%
|
36.1±20.4%
|
0.601
|
|
Postoperative
|
24.2±20.6%
|
19.6±20.0%
|
0.648
|
|
Correction
|
15.9±14.0%
|
18.5±14.3%
|
0.969
|
|
Followup
|
0.4±10.9%
|
5.4±21.3%
|
0.476
|
|
Remodeling
|
27.8±20.3%
|
24.5±11.8%
|
0.109
|
DISCUSSION:
Our results demonstrate that transpedicular intracorporal grafting in
the treatment of burst fractures does not effect the rate of reconstruction
of the canal area as well as remodeling. Spinal canal remodeling was observed
to occur in all patients regardless of grafting, eventually leading to
overcorrection in some. On the other hand, it was also seen that this
technique is not effective in preventing the deterioration of radiological
findings in patients treated with short segment posterior instrumentation.
|
|